Thursday, 18 April 2024

Quantum Internet: Evolutionary and Revolutionary Perspectives – Key Insights from the Webinar

theNetworkingChannel hosted another interesting webinar recently exploring the topic of how Quantum Internet is emerging and has many open directions, from disruptive and long-term ideas to concrete applications that can be explored with real devices today.

The panel consists of distinguished experts, including: 

  • Bernardo Huberman – Fellow and Vice President of Next – Gen Systems – CableLabs – USA
  • Marcello Caleffi – Professor – University of Naples “Federico II” – Italy
  • Stephan Ritter – Director of Applications of Quantum Technologies – TOPTICA Photonics AG – Germany
  • Stefano Pirandola – Founder and CEO – nodeQ – Professor – University of York – UK

The webinar description stated:

As Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) technology approaches maturity, the scientific community is now turning its attention to more advanced applications of quantum networks at metropolitan and international scales, such as distributed/delegated quantum computing and quantum sensor networks, requiring end-to-end entanglement of qubits, quantum memories, and varying degrees of fault tolerance. To make a leapfrogging advance, the co-existence of upcoming quantum networks with classical networks is also becoming more focal, with a significant impact at the physical level (i.e., the sharing of a telco fiber or rack space in an exchange point) and from a logical perspective (i.e., the integration with control/management planes of an Internet Service Provider or the interplay with classical jobs to be executed in a High-Performance Computing infrastructure). In this panel, we will discuss the research and development trends currently occupying the top positions of the priority list to make the Quantum Internet a real thing, with a tangible impact on industry, science, and society.

Key Takeaways:

The webinar looked at Quantum physics principles, such as superposition and entanglement, underlie the technology and have led to exciting developments, including the potential for quantum computers to solve complex problems and enable secure communication. Quantum entanglement can be used to coordinate parties without communication, enabling secure auctions and frequency hopping spread spectrum technology, which has been around since the 1950s. 

Early Applications and Challenges:

  • Frequency hopping, used for secure communications since the 1950s, faces issues with machine learning-based attacks due to predictable sequences.
  • QKD offers a solution by enabling Alice and Bob to coordinate using truly random, provably secure sequences.
  • Despite its potential, building a quantum internet faces practical hurdles, including high implementation costs.

Quantum Internet Architecture: Revolution Over Evolution:

  • The panel debated whether the Quantum Internet should evolve from classical networks or be a complete revolution. The consensus leaned toward a full redesign, requiring a new protocol stack rather than incremental updates.
  • Entanglement is the core resource, unlike classical information, as it requires coordinated multi-node operations.

Technologies and Prototypes: 

  • Quantum memories rely on specific lasers to manipulate qubits, and wavelength conversion techniques are being developed for compatibility.
  • A prototype network is under construction, aiming to demonstrate teleportation and blind quantum computation by the decade’s end.
  • The Quantum Internet Alliance (QIA) launched the QIA Technology Forum (QIATF) to foster collaboration among academia, industry, and ecosystem partners.

Quantum Teleportation and Distributed Computing:

  • Quantum teleportation enables remote quantum computers to exchange qubits by sharing entangled states.
  • This is fundamental for distributed quantum computing, where multiple machines collaborate remotely.
  • Achieving a hybrid Quantum Internet will require interfaces (e.g., electro-optical converters) to connect diverse quantum systems like photonic, superconducting, and solid-state qubits.

Commercialisation and Future Outlook

  • Quantum-secured communications for military use could emerge in 10–15 years.
  • A full-fledged Quantum Internet could take 25 years, comparable in scale to the classical internet.
  • Gradual progress is expected, with significant quantum computing milestones in 5–10 years.

While the slides have not been shared, the video of the webinar is embedded below:


Friday, 5 April 2024

A Different Approach for Mobile Network Densification

I am fascinated by and have previously written blog posts about transparent antennas. Back in 2019 NTT Docomo announced that they have been working with glass manufacturer AGC to create a new transparent antenna that can work with a base station to become an antenna. Then in 2021, NTT Docomo and AGC announced that they have developed a prototype technology that efficiently guides 28-GHz 5G radio signals received from outdoors to specific locations indoors using a film-like metasurface lens that attaches to window surfaces. Transparent antennas/lens are one of the pillars of Docomo’s 6G vision as can be seen here.

Every year at Mobile World Congress I look for a wow product/demo. While there were some that impressed me, the suite of products from Wave by AGC (WAVEANTENNA, WAVETHRU and WAVETRAP) blew me away. Let’s look at each of them briefly:

WAVEANTENNA is the transparent glass antenna which is generally installed indoors, on a window or a glass pane. It can be used to receive signals from outdoors (as in case of FWA) or can be used to broadcast signal outdoors (for densification based on inside-out coverage). In the newer buildings that has thermal insulation films on the glass, the radio signals are highly attenuated in either direction, so this solution could work well in that scenario in conjunction with WAVETHRU.

The WAVETHRU process applies a unique laser pattern to the glazing with 30 µm laser engraved lines that are nearly invisible to the naked eye. Treatment is so gentle, it does not affect the physical properties of the glazing, which remain the same. This radio-friendly laser treatment improves the indoor radio signal by around 25 dB, to achieve almost the same level of performance as the street signal. Just 20% to 30% of the window and floors 0 to 4 need to be treated to improve the indoor signal on all frequency ranges under 6GHz.

In case of coverage densification by providing inside-out radio signals, WAVETRAP can be used for EM wave shielding by stopping back-lobes within the building. 

This video from WAVE by AGC explains the whole densification solution:

 

Now the question is, why was I impressed with this solution? Regular readers of this and the Telecoms Infrastructure Blog will have noticed the various solutions I have been writing about for mobile network densification in downtown areas and historic cities with listed buildings where limited space for infrastructure deployment presents several challenges. 

In brief, we can categorise these challenges as follows:

  • Physical Space Constraints like lack of space or strict regulations as in case of listed buildings and heritage sites. 
  • Aesthetics and Visual Impact could be an important consideration in certain historic city centres. Deploying large antennae or towers can clash with the architectural character and heritage of the area and may require concealing antennae within existing structures like chimneys, bus shelters, phone boxes & lampposts, or using disguised designs like fake trees to minimize visual impact.
  • Technical Challenges can arise in dense urban environments due to interference from neighbouring cells, unreliable backhaul connectivity, interruptions in the power supply due to siphoning, etc.
  • Community Engagement and Perception is another important area to consider. There is no shortage of NIMBY (Not in my back yard) activists that may oppose new infrastructure due to health concerns, aesthetics, or fear of property devaluation. Engaging with the community, providing accurate information about EMF exposure, and addressing misconceptions are crucial.
  • Regulatory and Permitting Hurdles that may arise due to many cities and councils imposing zoning and permits requirements. Obtaining permits for infrastructure deployment involves navigating local regulations, zoning laws, and historic preservation boards. There may also be height restrictions that may hinder optimal antenna placement.
  • Finally, Cost and ROI are important consideration factors as all of the above increases the costs as well as the time required. Customized designs, site acquisition, and compliance with regulations are one of the major factors that not only increase costs but also delays infrastructure rollouts. Operators often weigh the benefits of improved coverage and capacity against all the expenses and headaches of infrastructure deployment and then decide on what to deploy and where.

A solution like WAVEANTENNA in conjunction with WAVETHRU and WAVETRAP can significantly reduce the hurdles and improve coverage significantly. 

While I have talked about the solution in general, it can also be applied indoors to Wi-Fi, in addition to 4G/5G. This may be useful in case of Enterprise Networks where appearance is of importance and probably not of much use in case of warehouses or Industrial/Factory Networks. 

Do let me know what you think.

Related Posts