Capacity and Coverage Optimisation (CCO) was already nominally part of the Release-9 WI, but could not be completed due to amount of work related to other use cases.
Energy Savings are a very important topic, especially for operators, as solutions derived for this use case can significantly limit their expenses. According to TR 36.902 this solution should concern switching off cells or whole base stations. This may require additional standardised methods, once there is need identified for.
Basic functionality of Mobility Load Balancing (MLB) and Mobility Robustness Optimisation (MRO), also listed in TR 36.902, were defined in Rel.9. However, successful roll-out of the LTE network requires analysing possible enhancements to the Rel.9 solutions for MLB and MRO. In particular, enhancements that address inter-RAT scenarios and inter-RAT information exchange must be considered. These enhancements should be addressed in Rel.10.
There may also be other use cases for LTE for which SON functionality would bring optimisations.
Although, it is of primary interest to provide coverage to users during a roll-out, it is equally important to enhance the capacity of the network during operation. As such, both coverage and capacity are considered in the use case and supported by the SON function. The CCO SON function should be configured through appropriate objectives and targets in order to meet the operator’s requirement on coverage and capacity, and the prioritization between them.
The following use cases and scenarios are planned for Release-10:
Coverage and Capacity Optimisation (CCO)
The use case is to enable detection of following problems:
• Priority 1: coverage problems, e.g. coverage holes
• Priority 2: capacity problems
Mobility Robustness Optimisation (MRO) enhancements
The use case is to enable detection and to provide tools for possible correction of following problems:
• Connection failures in inter-RAT environment:
o Priority 1: at HOs from LTE to UMTS/GSM
o Priority 2: at HOs from UMTS/GSM to LTE
• Obtaining UE measurements in case of unsuccessful re-establishment after connection
failure
• Ping-pongs in idle mode (inter-RAT and intra-LTE environment)
• Ping-pongs in active mode (inter-RAT)
• HO to wrong cell (in intra-LTE environment) that does not cause connection failure (e.g. short stay problem)
Mobility Load Balancing (MLB) enhancements
The use case is to fulfil following objectives:
• Improving reliability of MLB in intra-LTE scenarios
• Improving functionality of the MLB in inter-RAT scenarios (the transport method agreed for R9 should be used for R10).
For more info see
3GPP TS 32.521: Self-Organizing Networks (SON) Policy Network Resource Model (NRM) Integration Reference Point (IRP); Requirements; Release-10
If you havent read the
3G Americas whitepaper on SON, it is definitely worth a read. I have embedded it below.